Emerging trends in nurse-led programs of care for management of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic literature review / Tendencias emergentes en los programas de atención dirigidos por enfermeras para el manejo de pacientes con artritis reumatoide establecida: Revisión sistemática de la literatura

Introduction: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), nurses are considered as essential, not only to ensure pharmacological safety, but also in the promotion in self-care and decision-making, favouring the empowerment of patients. This systematic review aimed to summarize the available literature on the health education by the nurse in patients with RA. Material and methods: Following Cochrane Collaboration procedures, the PRISMA statement and PRISMA checklist, relevant quantitative studies published were retrieved from the CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed and Medic databases and then systematically reviewed. The search ended in August 2021. Nineteen studies were retained for inclusion and evaluated with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network for Systematic Reviews. Results: We found statistically significant improvement in self-care (five studies), disease activity (three studies), quality of life (two studies), satisfaction (five studies) and adherence (one study) with the nursing-led management of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. Discussion: Although there is solid evidence of improvement in satisfaction and self-care, there seems to be a trend also to improve other outcomes, such as DAS28, from the EULAR recommendations, the expansion of the therapeutic arsenal for rheumatoid arthritis and shared decision-making. In addition, recently and due to the implementation of new technologies, the role of the nurse has been evaluated through virtual consultations. The results of recent studies have shown that this an effective and well-accepted novel approach for the management of patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Our study suggests that nurse-led health education, in addition of improvement in satisfaction and self-care, improve activity disease scores in RA patients.(AU)

Introducción: En los pacientes con artritis reumatoide, las enfermeras se consideran esenciales, no solo para garantizar la seguridad farmacológica, sino también en la prestación de promoción en el autocuidado y la toma de decisiones, favoreciendo el empoderamiento de los pacientes. Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo resumir la literatura disponible sobre la educación sanitaria por parte de la enfermera en pacientes con artritis reumatoide. Material y métodos: Siguiendo los procedimientos de la Colaboración Cochrane, la declaración PRISMA y la lista de comprobación PRISMA, se recuperaron los estudios cuantitativos relevantes publicados en las bases de datos CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed y Medic y, a continuación, se revisaron sistemáticamente. La búsqueda finalizó en agosto de 2021. Diecinueve estudios fueron retenidos para su inclusión y evaluados con la Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network for Systematic Reviews. ResultadosSe encontró una mejoría estadísticamente significativa en el autocuidado (cinco estudios), la actividad de la enfermedad (tres estudios), la calidad de vida (dos estudios), la satisfacción (cinco estudios) y la adherencia (un estudio) con el manejo dirigido por enfermería de pacientes con artritis reumatoide establecida. Discusión: Aunque siempre ha habido evidencias de mejora en la satisfacción y el autocuidado, parece haber una tendencia a mejorar también otros resultados, como el de Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28), a partir de las recomendaciones de la European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), la ampliación del arsenal terapéutico para la artritis reumatoide y la toma de decisiones compartida. Además, recientemente y debido a la implantación de las nuevas tecnologías, se ha evaluado el papel de la enfermera a través de las consultas virtuales. Los resultados de estudios recientes han demostrado que se trata de un nuevo enfoque...(AU)

Effect of nursing intervention based on continuity model on psychological stress state of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

To explore the effect of nursing intervention based on continuity model on psychological stress state of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 128 patients with RA in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were selected and divided into 2 groups by random number table method, 64 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group received nursing intervention based on continuity model. The physiological function recovery, psychological stress, negative psychology, trait coping style and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups. Compared with the control group, the first time to get out of bed, the time to subside swelling of upper limb and the length of hospital stay in the experimental group were significantly shorter, the sleep time was significantly longer, and the visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the experimental group (all P < .05). After receiving nursing intervention, the psychological stress scores of somatizations, anxiety and depression of all patients were significantly lower than before nursing, and the above scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < .05). After nursing, the positive coping score, negative coping score and quality of life score of all patients were significantly higher than those before nursing, and the above scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P < .05). Nursing intervention based on continuity model can promote the recovery of physical function, improve psychological stress and negative emotions, and improve the quality of life of patients with RA, which is worthy of clinical application.

Nurse-led care for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the global literature and proposed strategies for implementation in Africa and the Middle East.

Globally, increasing demand for rheumatology services has led to a greater reliance on non-physician healthcare professionals (HCPs), such as rheumatology nurse specialists, to deliver care as part of a multidisciplinary team. Across Africa and the Middle East (AfME), there remains a shortage of rheumatology HCPs, including rheumatology nurses, which presents a major challenge to the delivery of rheumatology services, and subsequently the treatment and management of conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To further explore the importance of nurse-led care (NLC) for patients with RA and create a set of proposed strategies for the implementation of NLC in the AfME region, we used a modified Delphi technique. A review of the global literature was conducted using the PubMed search engine, with the most relevant publications selected. The findings were summarized and presented to the author group, which was composed of representatives from different countries and HCP disciplines. The authors also drew on their knowledge of the wider literature to provide context. Overall, results suggest that NLC is associated with improved patient perceptions of RA care, and equivalent or superior clinical and cost outcomes versus physician-led care in RA disease management. Expert commentary provided by the authors gives insights into the challenges of implementing nurse-led RA care. We further report practical proposed strategies for the development and implementation of NLC for patients with RA, specifically in the AfME region. These proposed strategies aim to act as a foundation for the introduction and development of NLC programs across the AfME region.

The patient perspective of nurse-led care in early rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of qualitative studies with thematic analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Management of rheumatoid arthritis has changed dramatically over the last decade and is characterised by early start of intensive treatment and tight monitoring of disease activity until remission. The role of nurse-led care at early stage of disease is not well understood. AIMS: To develop an understanding of rheumatology nurse-led care from the perspective of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A systematic review of qualitative studies, reported in line with PRISMA checklist. In March 2019, the following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and OpenGrey. Studies were included if they: included adults with rheumatoid arthritis; were qualitative studies with data on patients' perspectives of nurse-led care; and published in peer-reviewed journals, in English, between 2010-2019. Due to few studies in early rheumatoid arthritis, inclusion was extended to adults with established rheumatoid arthritis. Two reviewers screened abstracts and full texts. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. Thematic synthesis was conducted according to the framework of Thomas and Harden (2008). RESULTS: The search identified 1034 records. After screening and assessing for eligibility, eight qualitative studies were included in the review (133 patients). Three themes were identified from the synthesis. Nurse-led care was seen to provide professional expertise in planning and delivery of care. A person-centred approach was used combined with good communication skills, thus creating a positive therapeutic environment. Nurse-led care was described as providing a sense of empowerment and psychological support. CONCLUSION: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are supportive of nurse-led care. They value its professionalism and person-centred approach which provide a sense of security and confidence. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings outline ingredients of nurse-led care that are important to patients. These can inform nurses' professional development plans, service improvement and the competence framework for rheumatology nursing.

2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis.

To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA) using the most up to date evidence. The EULAR standardised operating procedures were followed. A task force of rheumatologists, health professionals and patients, representing 17 European countries updated the recommendations, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Higher level of evidence and new insights into nursing care for patients with CIA were added to the recommendation. Level of agreement was obtained by email voting. The search identified 2609 records, of which 51 (41 papers, 10 abstracts), mostly on rheumatoid arthritis, were included. Based on consensus, the task force formulated three overarching principles and eight recommendations. One recommendation remained unchanged, six were reworded, two were merged and one was reformulated as an overarching principle. Two additional overarching principles were formulated. The overarching principles emphasise the nurse's role as part of a healthcare team, describe the importance of providing evidence-based care and endorse shared decision-making in the nursing consultation with the patient. The recommendations cover the contribution of rheumatology nursing in needs-based patient education, satisfaction with care, timely access to care, disease management, efficiency of care, psychosocial support and the promotion of self-management. The level of agreement among task force members was high (mean 9.7, range 9.6-10.0). The updated recommendations encompass three overarching principles and eight evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of CIA.

The effectiveness of nurse-led case management for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Case management is a patient-centred approach which has shown efficacy in managing patients with chronic and life-threatening disease. Presently, the effect of case management delivered by nurses for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients remains unclear, especially for those subjects who reside in Asia. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of nurse-led case management (NLCM) among RA patients in Taiwan. METHODS: A quasi-experimental research design was utilised to recruit RA patients from a hospital in Taiwan. All patients who were diagnosed as having RA from January 2017 to June 2018 were free to opt to participate in the intervention. The experiment group (n = 50) received six sessions of NLCM over six months, while the control group (n = 46) received only standard care during the same time period. Effectiveness data were collected through the review of medical records and a structured questionnaire that included the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ), the arthritis self-efficacy scale and a disease activity score by 28 joints (DAS28) at three time points (T1: before NLCM; T2: three days after NLCM completion; and T3: six months after NLCM completion). The effects of NLCM were determined using a generalised estimating equations model. RESULTS: After adjusting for several potential confounders, we found that the NLCM implementation decreased the levels of DAS28 (T1 = -0.78; T2 = -0.85; all at P = .01) and TDQ (T1 = -3.86; T2 = -10.57; all at P < .05) and enhanced ASES level for RA patients (T1 = 132.03; T2 = 484.69; all at P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study adopted a non-randomised, unblinded and uncontrolled intervention, and the findings supported the positive effects of NLCM following the use of a robust statistical method. The findings may serve as a reference for instituting more appropriate interventions for RA patients.

Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is evidence for the clinical effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered by clinical psychologists, but few rheumatology units have psychologists. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group CBT programme for RA fatigue [named RAFT, i.e. Reducing Arthritis Fatigue by clinical Teams using cognitive-behavioural (CB) approaches], delivered by the rheumatology team in addition to usual care (intervention), with usual care alone (control); and to evaluate tutors' experiences of the RAFT programme. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. Central trials unit computerised randomisation in four consecutive cohorts within each of the seven centres. A nested qualitative evaluation was undertaken. SETTING: Seven hospital rheumatology units in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with RA and fatigue severity of ≥ 6 [out of 10, as measured by the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Numerical Rating Scale (BRAF-NRS)] who had no recent changes in major RA medication/glucocorticoids. INTERVENTIONS: RAFT - group CBT programme delivered by rheumatology tutor pairs (nurses/occupational therapists). Usual care - brief discussion of a RA fatigue self-management booklet with the research nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary - fatigue impact (as measured by the BRAF-NRS) at 26 weeks. Secondary - fatigue severity/coping (as measured by the BRAF-NRS); broader fatigue impact [as measured by the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multidimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ)]; self-reported clinical status; quality of life; mood; self-efficacy; and satisfaction. All data were collected at weeks 0, 6, 26, 52, 78 and 104. In addition, fatigue data were collected at weeks 10 and 18. The intention-to-treat analysis conducted was blind to treatment allocation, and adjusted for baseline scores and centre. Cost-effectiveness was explored through the intervention and RA-related health and social care costs, allowing the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version (EQ-5D-5L). Tutor and focus group interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 308 out of 333 patients completed 26 weeks (RAFT, n/N = 156/175; control, n/N = 152/158). At 26 weeks, the mean BRAF-NRS impact was reduced for the RAFT programme (-1.36 units; p < 0.001) and the control interventions (-0.88 units; p < 0.004). Regression analysis showed a difference between treatment arms in favour of the RAFT programme [adjusted mean difference -0.59 units, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.11 to -0.06 units; p = 0.03, effect size 0.36], and this was sustained over 2 years (-0.49 units, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.14 units; p = 0.01). At 26 weeks, further fatigue differences favoured the RAFT programme (BRAF-MDQ fatigue impact: adjusted mean difference -3.42 units, 95% CI -6.44 to - 0.39 units, p = 0.03; living with fatigue: adjusted mean difference -1.19 units, 95% CI -2.17 to -0.21 units, p = 0.02; and emotional fatigue: adjusted mean difference -0.91 units, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.23 units, p = 0.01), and these fatigue differences were sustained over 2 years. Self-efficacy favoured the RAFT programme at 26 weeks (Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale: adjusted mean difference 3.05 units, 95% CI 0.43 to 5.6 units; p = 0.02), as did BRAF-NRS coping over 2 years (adjusted mean difference 0.42 units, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77 units; p = 0.02). Fatigue severity and other clinical outcomes were not different between trial arms and no harms were reported. Satisfaction with the RAFT programme was high, with 89% of patients scoring ≥ 8 out of 10, compared with 54% of patients in the control arm rating the booklet (p < 0.0001); and 96% of patients and 68% of patients recommending the RAFT programme and the booklet, respectively, to others (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between arms for total societal costs including the RAFT programme training and delivery (mean difference £434, 95% CI -£389 to £1258), nor QALYs gained (mean difference 0.008, 95% CI -0.008 to 0.023). The probability of the RAFT programme being cost-effective was 28-35% at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's thresholds of £20,000-30,000 per QALY. Tutors felt that the RAFT programme's CB approaches challenged their usual problem-solving style, helped patients make life changes and improved tutors' wider clinical practice. LIMITATIONS: Primary outcome data were missing for 25 patients; the EQ-5D-5L might not capture fatigue change; and 30% of the 2-year economic data were missing. CONCLUSIONS: The RAFT programme improves RA fatigue impact beyond usual care alone; this was sustained for 2 years with high patient satisfaction, enhanced team skills and no harms. The RAFT programme is < 50% likely to be cost-effective; however, NHS costs were similar between treatment arms. FUTURE WORK: Given the paucity of RA fatigue interventions, rheumatology teams might investigate the pragmatic implementation of the RAFT programme, which is low cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52709998. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 57. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a lifelong inflammatory condition affecting multiple joints, with fatigue as a major consequence. Cognitive­behavioural therapy (CBT) helps patients work out links between symptoms, behaviours and thoughts driving those behaviours (e.g. why someone pushes on when exhausted), and understanding these links helps patients make changes. A CBT programme for groups of RA patients, facilitated by a psychologist, reduces fatigue impact. However, few rheumatology teams have psychologists. The study tested whether or not rheumatology nurses and occupational therapists (OTs) could facilitate the programme [named RAFT, i.e. Reducing Arthritis Fatigue by clinical Teams using cognitive­behavioural (CB) approaches] after brief training. The study compared the RAFT programme with usual care for RA fatigue (i.e. a short discussion of an arthritis fatigue booklet). All 333 patients received usual care, and then half of the patients were allocated (by chance) to also attend the seven-session RAFT programme. The study compared the RAFT programme with usual care for effects on fatigue, quality of life, cost and value for money. In addition, the rheumatology nurse and OT RAFT tutors were interviewed for their views on the RAFT programme. The study found that patients' fatigue impact was reduced by both the RAFT programme and usual care at 6 months and 2 years, but patients undertaking the RAFT programme improved significantly more than those receiving usual care alone. Differences were seen for improvements in fatigue impact, fatigue coping, emotional fatigue and living with fatigue. Patients were very satisfied with the RAFT programme and attended most of the sessions. The study found no significant difference between the NHS costs of the RAFT programme and usual care. Neither the RAFT programme nor usual care changed quality of life; therefore, standard value-for-money tests showed no difference between them. Tutors found that the CB questioning approach of the RAFT programme was different from their usual problem-solving style, but helped patients make life changes, and the new CB skills improved tutors' wider clinical practice. In conclusion, the trial has shown that the RAFT programme has a small to medium effect on reducing fatigue impact in patients with RA and is a potentially low-cost intervention that can be delivered by rheumatology nurses and OTs rather than a psychologist.

Effectiveness of health education by telephone follow-up on self-efficacy among discharged patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomised control trial.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the effectiveness of a health education programme by telephone follow-up on the self-efficacy of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). BACKGROUND: Self-efficacy is increasingly perceived to be a cornerstone in improving the capacity of self-management. However, a paucity of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of health education by the use of a telephone follow-up for RA patients in China. DESIGN: This study was a randomised control trial. METHODS: Recruited patients were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention group accepted health education by telephone follow-up four times after the patients were discharged. The patients in the control group only accepted telephone follow-up once after they were discharged. Self-efficacy was measured by the use of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (RASE), and data were collected at the day before the discharge, the 12th week and the 24th week after patients were discharged. The CONSORT checklist was used to check the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 92 discharged patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled. The sociodemographic indexes of the control and intervention groups had no significant differences at baseline (p > .05). The RASE score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (p < .05) at the 12th week and the 24th week. CONCLUSION: The HET improved the self-efficacy of the discharged patients with RA in the 12th week and the 24th week after discharge. This study demonstrated that our HET can improve the short-term and long-term effects of self-efficacy, which implies that the clinical nursing staff should increase the frequency of HET to improve the patients' knowledge and abilities of self-management. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients with RA will benefit from a health education programme by telephone follow-up; thus, it is necessary for nursing managers to implement this programme.

Nurse telephone education for promoting a treat-to-target approach in recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients: A pilot project.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to implement a nurse telephone education programme for patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that promotes shared decision-making and a treat-to-target approach. METHODS: This was a pilot project of newly diagnosed adult RA patients conducted between November 2015 and December 2016. A rheumatology clinic nurse telephoned patients to offer disease education. A toolkit was mailed to patients. Measures included call attempts, call time, a qualitative description of free-text notes and the proportion of patients who adhered to their next clinic visit. Data were analysed descriptively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients participated in the nurse calls. Most patients were female (65%), with a median age of 54 years (range 22-78 years). Median call length was 14.5 min, with a range of 8-23 min. Qualitative notes indicated that patients overwhelmingly supported the nurse calls. Nineteen patients (73%) were adherent to their follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: This preliminary project successfully implemented an educational programme that included a nurse-facilitated, RA-specific, telephone call and toolkit. This educational programme could be a model for similar educational efforts by other clinics.

Burden for Parents of Patients With Schizophrenia-A Nationwide Comparative Study of Parents of Offspring With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Epilepsy, and Healthy Controls.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to (1) compare the risk of health care use, adverse health status, and work productivity loss of parents of patients with schizophrenia to parents of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), epilepsy, and healthy controls; and (2) evaluate such outcome measures while considering disease severity of schizophrenia. METHODS: Based on linkage of Swedish registers, at least one parent was included (n = 18215) of patients with schizophrenia (information 2006-2013, n = 10883). Similarly, parental information was linked to patients with MS, RA, epilepsy, and matched healthy controls, comprising 11292, 15516, 34715, and 18408 parents, respectively. Disease severity of schizophrenia was analyzed. Different regression models yielding odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), or relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were run. RESULTS: Psychiatric health care use, mainly due to anxiety and affective disorders, showed a strongly increasing trend for parents of patients with schizophrenia throughout the observation period. During the follow-up, these parents had an up to 2.7 times higher risk of specialized psychiatric health care and receipt of social welfare benefits than other parents. Parents of the moderately severely ill patients with schizophrenia had higher risk estimates for psychiatric health care (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.07-1.17) compared with parents of least severely ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of patients with schizophrenia have a considerably higher risk of psychiatric health care and social welfare benefit receipt than other parents. Psychiatric health care use worsens over time and with increasing disease severity of the offspring.

They have got the blues: patient's mood- and disease activity-related psychological burden of rheumatoid arthritis on caregivers.

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as a long-lasting disease, not only affects the musculoskeletal health but also deteriorates the psychological well-being of the patient. What about their caregivers? There exist a limited number of studies on this issue. The objectives of the present study were (i) to evaluate the psychological health among caregivers of RA patients and (ii) to determine the confounding factors playing role on their psychological status. Methods: Fifty-three RA patients and their caregivers were included in this cross-sectional study. Disease activity was assessed by using the disease activity score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index-5 (RADAI-5), while disability was evaluated by disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Psychological status was tested by Beck's depression and anxiety inventories (BDI and BAI). Results: A total of 53 patients with RA were included in the study. Caregivers' depression score was weakly correlated with disease activity variables including DAS28-CRP, RADAI and DASH scores (rs = .304, rs = .392 and rs = .301, respectively); and moderately correlated with patients' depression score and caregivers' comorbidity (rs = .407 and rs = .451, respectively). Conclusions: The psychological impact of RA on caregivers appears to be associated with patients' mood, disease activity and upper extremity functionality.

An evaluation of the Virtual Monitoring Clinic, a novel nurse-led service for monitoring patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To study clinical and patient reported outcomes for the Virtual Monitoring Clinic (VMC), a remote nurse-led telemonitoring service for monitoring Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients with stable RA enrolled in the VMC were followed up prospectively. The primary outcomes evaluated at 1-year follow-up were: Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and patient satisfaction assessed using an 11-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 251 patients enrolled, 186 completed 1-year of follow-up. There was a 2.3% (n = 450) reduction in the annual workload from the rheumatology specialist outpatient clinic as a result of the VMC. Statistically significant improvement was seen in the mean patient satisfaction score (7.70-8.16, P ≤ 0.001), with 61.5% of patients opting for the VMC alternating with rheumatology outpatient clinic visits as their preferred mode of follow-up vis-à-vis standard care. There was a marginal increase in mean DAS28 and RAPID3 scores from 2.56 to 2.78 (P < 0.05) and 5.28 to 6.03 (P < 0.05), respectively. However, given that at 1-year follow-up more than half (72.0% and 63.4% based on DAS28 and RAPID3) of the patients' disease activity had improved or remained stable, and was in remission or low activity (73.1% and 53.2% based on DAS28 and RAPID3), the VMC seemed to maintain a stable RA disease activity for the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The VMC is an effective and well-accepted novel approach for the management of patients with stable RA.

Incorporating motivational interviewing into rheumatology care.

Deborah Palmer, Advanced Nurse Practitioner, North Middlesex University Hospital, and Yasser El Miedany, Consultant Rheumatologist, discuss ways to close the gap between disease control and patient empowerment.

Nursing sensitive outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Although rheumatology nursing has been shown to be effective in managing patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patient outcomes sensitive to nursing interventions (nursing sensitive outcomes) have not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify and delineate relevant patient outcomes measured in studies that reported nursing interventions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: A systematic search was conducted from 1990 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were (i) patients with rheumatoid arthritis, (ii) adult population age ≥16years, (iii) nurse as part of the care team or intervention delivery, (iv) primary research only, (v) English language, and (vi) quantitative studies with nursing sensitive outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL, Ovid nursing, Cochrane library and PsycINFO databases were searched for relevant studies. REVIEW METHODS: Using the predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria, nine reviewers working in pairs assessed the eligibility of the identified studies based on titles and abstracts. Papers meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved and full texts were further assessed. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Data on nursing sensitive outcomes were extracted independently by two reviewers. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology comprehensive conceptual framework for health was used to contextualise and present findings. RESULTS: Of the 820 articles retrieved, 7 randomised controlled trials and 3 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen nursing sensitive outcomes were identified (disease activity, clinical effects, pain, early morning stiffness duration, fatigue, patient safety issues, function, knowledge, patient satisfaction, confidence in care received, mental health status, self-efficacy, patient attitude/perception of ability to control arthritis, quality of life, health utility, health care resources, death). These fitted into 10 health intervention domains in keeping with the pre-specified conceptual framework for health: disease status, effectiveness, safety, function, knowledge, satisfaction, psychological status, quality of life, cost, death. A total of 59 measurement instruments were identified comprising patient reported outcome measures (n=31), and biologic measures and reports (n=28). CONCLUSIONS: This review is notable in that it is the first to have identified, and reported, a set of multidimensional outcome measures that are sensitive to nursing interventions in rheumatology specifically. Further research is required to determine a core set of outcomes to be used in all rheumatology nursing intervention studies.

Economic analysis of a nurse-led programme for comorbidities management of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cause major functional, psychological, social and occupational repercussions for patients and has important economic consequences for society. The principal objective of this work was to determine the economic pertinence of a staff nurse specialised in preventive management for these patients. METHODS: The COMEDRA multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial, conducted from March 2011 to June 2012, showed the effectiveness of a nurse-led programme dedicated to the management of comorbidities trough the promotion of 11 preventive procedures. A cost-benefit analysis, from a societal perspective and based on direct medical cost, was conducted to assess the equivalence of the cost of the nurse-led programme and the cost of the additional preventive procedures performed, engendered by the programme. The programme was considered effective if its cost was less than or equal to the costs of the additional preventive procedures. The costs were calculated from the approved health insurance charges. From the total costs induced, a contributive share was measured, corresponding to the ratio of the total costs of each type of procedure to the overall total cost. RESULTS: The cost of the intervention was assessed at €16,804.2. This intervention contributed to the performance of 747 additional preventive procedures, at a cost of €30,184.8. This intervention with these patients is financially balanced when at least 37 patients follow the recommendations for every preventive procedure. CONCLUSIONS: From the hospital's perspective and from both a medical and economic point of view, a nurse-led programme to manage the comorbidities of RA is useful.

The role of nurse practitioners in delivering rheumatology care and services: Results of a U.S. survey.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation, pain, joint stiffness, and progressive joint destruction. An increased demand for rheumatology healthcare professionals is anticipated in coming years; utilizing more nurse practitioners (NPs) in rheumatology may help meet this demand, and improve early detection and diagnosis of RA. METHODS: The American Association of Nurse Practitioners surveyed, via e-mail, members who were working in primary care settings to understand their educational and professional needs to help manage their patients with RA. Respondents were surveyed about their NP certifications, patient panel, information received from rheumatologists on shared patients, RA tools or resources that would be helpful, confidence in diagnosing and managing patients with RA, interest in learning about particular topics regarding RA medications, and preferences for exchanging educational information with their professional colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this survey indicate that the role of NPs in managing RA could be optimized by improved communication with treating rheumatologists, access to educational tools and resources, and further education and training in the management of RA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: NPs in primary care can fill a resource gap and provide access to health care for patients with RA.

A national survey of nurse training: Confidence and competence in educating patients commencing methotrexate therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate is routinely used to treat active disease in inflammatory arthritis. There have previously been patient safety concerns associated with methotrexate usage in practice. Most patients commencing methotrexate treatment are seen by the rheumatology nurse, to receive education (often referred to as drug counselling) on this agent prior to starting treatment. Yet, there are no recommended criteria regarding education or experience to ensure minimum competence of the rheumatology nurse. The objectives of the present survey were, firstly, to identify the relevant training experience of rheumatology nurses who provide methotrexate education and, secondly, to explore their confidence and competence in undertaking this role. METHOD: A national electronic survey of rheumatology nurses, identified via the Royal College of Nursing Rheumatology Forum, national meetings and personal contacts, in order to access nurses who counsel patients on methotrexate, was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 104 nurses completed the survey. Reported training was highly variable, ranging from very little to having undertaken MSc courses. Knowledge of the drug was rated as the most important requirement. Confidence was largely very good and was reported to develop with experience, with 80% of participants reporting being confident after 1 year in the role. A small number of participants (four) indicated that they were 'not at all confident'. Aspects of competence and knowledge were assessed using questions on clinical situations; knowledge appeared to be good, with the exception of a question on shingles. Confidence correlated with knowledge (r = 0.21; p = 0.05), amount of training (r = 0.24; p = 0.03) and most strongly with time in the role (r = 0.74; p = 0.00001). The amount of training correlated with confidence but not with knowledge. All participants used written information, often using more than one source, with 87% of participants favouring the Arthritis Research UK information leaflet on methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: There was a wide variety of training for this role. Confidence seemed to come with experience, training and knowledge, and took many months to develop. A training package in this area may be helpful. Reassuringly, confidence and knowledge were related.

Pediatric rheumatologic diseases: A review for primary care NPs.

Rheumatologic diseases are uncommon in children but have the potential for significant morbidity, mortality, and disability. This article reviews the most common rheumatologic diseases in children, their diagnostic evaluations, and the NP's role in the management and coordination of these conditions.

Nurse-led Care for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Effect on Quality of Care.

OBJECTIVE: In the nurse-led care (NLC) model, nurses take on the primary responsibility for patient management. We systematically assessed the effect of NLC for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on multiple dimensions of quality of care from the Alberta Quality of Care Matrix for Health. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from 1950 to January 2015. English-language studies were included if they reported on NLC for patients with RA and assessed 1 or more dimensions of quality (effectiveness, acceptability, efficiency, accessibility, appropriateness, and safety). Data were synthesized using narrative analysis. RESULTS: We included 10 studies. The NLC models varied in terms of nurses' professional designation (clinical nurse specialists or nurse practitioners); however, their role in the clinic was fairly consistent. Disease activity was the most common measure of effectiveness, with NLC being equal (n = 2) or superior (n = 3) to the comparator. NLC was equal (n = 1) or superior (n = 5) versus the comparator in terms of patient satisfaction (i.e., acceptability of care). NLC was equally safe as other models (n = 2). Regarding efficiency, results varied across studies (n = 6) and did not allow for conclusions about models' cost-effectiveness. In qualitative studies, patients found NLC to be superior in terms of accessibility [i.e., continuity of care (n = 3) and appropriateness measured with education and support (n = 4)]; however, no quantitative measures were found. CONCLUSION: NLC for patients with RA is effective, acceptable, and safe as compared with other models. However, current evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about its efficiency, accessibility, and appropriateness.

The first national clinical audit for rheumatoid arthritis.

The first national audit for rheumatoid and early inflammatory arthritis has benchmarked care for the first 3 months of follow-up activity from first presentation to a rheumatology service. Access to care, management of early rheumatoid arthritis and support for self care were measured against National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards; impact of early arthritis and experience of care were measured using patient-reported outcome and experience measures. The results demonstrate delays in referral and accessing specialist care and the need for service improvement in treating to target, suppression of high levels of disease activity and support for self-care. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes within 3 months and high levels of overall satisfaction were reported but these results were affected by low response rates. This article presents a summary of the national data from the audit and discusses the implications for nursing practice.